Most private lenders assume that once their construction loan is documented and their mortgage is recorded, their lien priority is secure. In New York, that assumption can be wrong in a way that only becomes obvious once a contractor or supplier files a mechanic’s lien and a priority dispute lands in court.
New York’s Lien Law contains a specific, separate building loan agreement filing requirement, distinct from recording the mortgage itself. Miss this requirement, or file it incorrectly, and a lender’s mortgage can be subordinated to liens filed by unpaid contractors and material suppliers, even if the mortgage was recorded first and the loan funds were fully disbursed in good faith.
This single statutory provision, Section 22 of the New York Lien Law, is one of the most consequential and least understood aspects of construction financing in this state. Working with attorneys who understand the building loan agreement process, alongside the related trust fund provisions in Article 3-A of the Lien Law, is essential for any private lender, developer, or borrower involved in a construction project secured by a building loan agreement.
What Section 22 Actually Requires
Section 22 of the New York Lien Law requires that a building loan agreement, or a statement containing its essential terms, be filed with the county clerk in the county where the property is located before the lender advances any loan proceeds. This filing is separate and distinct from recording the mortgage that secures the loan.
Why the Filing Exists
The purpose of this building loan agreement filing requirement is transparency. Contractors, subcontractors, and material suppliers working on a construction project need a way to understand the financing behind the project, including how much money is available and under what conditions it will be disbursed, so they can assess their own risk of nonpayment before extending labor or materials on credit.
What Must Be Filed
Lenders generally have two options. They can file the complete building loan agreement itself, or they can file an abbreviated statement that discloses its essential terms, including the loan amount, the net sum available for the improvement after deducting fees and expenses, and the terms governing when and how advances will be disbursed. Whichever approach is used, the filing must accurately reflect the actual agreement between the parties.
The Priority Consequence of Non-Compliance
A lender can lose priority if the building loan agreement is missing or inaccurate. Contractors and suppliers may then gain priority through mechanics’ liens. This can happen regardless of when the lender recorded the mortgage. The lender may lose its secured position despite advancing funds in good faith.
Modifications Require Additional Filings
Lenders must generally file material modifications to preserve priority for the revised terms. These changes may increase the loan amount or extend the disbursement schedule. They may also revise other significant provisions. An unfiled amendment can leave additional advances without the original loan’s priority protection.
The Related Trust Fund Provisions Under Article 3-A
Article 3-A of the Lien Law separately governs how borrowers must use building loan funds. The law treats these advances as trust funds. Borrowers must first pay improvement costs, labor, materials, and other project expenses. They cannot use these funds for unrelated debts. Misusing loan proceeds can create personal liability. In some cases, principals of the borrowing entity may also face personal responsibility for the diversion.
Client Challenges Without Proper Legal Guidance
Construction financing moves quickly, and the technical requirements of Lien Law Section 22 are easy to overlook until a dispute forces the issue.
Assuming Mortgage Recording Alone Protects Priority
Many lenders assume recording the mortgage fully protects their lien position. However, Section 22 addresses a separate risk. It protects against subordination to mechanics’ liens filed by unpaid contractors and suppliers.
Filing Late or Filing an Incomplete Statement
The filing must occur before advances are made, and a statement that omits required essential terms, such as the net sum available for the improvement, may not provide the protection the lender is relying on.
Overlooking Modifications
Lenders who increase a loan amount, extend a maturity date, or otherwise modify a building loan agreement without filing the amendment can find that the modified terms do not carry the same priority protection as the original filing.
Borrowers Diverting Trust Funds
Developers under financial pressure sometimes use construction loan proceeds to cover unrelated business expenses or debts on other projects, not realizing that doing so can create personal liability under the trust fund provisions, separate and apart from any default under the loan itself.
Private Lenders Facing Unexpected Lien Disputes
A private lender who has not confirmed proper filing can find themselves in a priority dispute with a general contractor or material supplier long after the loan has closed and funds have already been disbursed, at a point when the options for correcting the problem are far more limited.
Investors Purchasing Partially Completed Projects
Buyers acquiring a property with an existing construction loan in place need to confirm that the building loan agreement was properly filed, since a defective filing on the existing loan can create title and lien priority problems that transfer directly to the new owner.
Applications and Benefits of Proper Compliance
For Private Lenders
Confirming that a building loan agreement, and any subsequent modifications, are properly filed protects the lender’s priority against mechanic’s liens that could otherwise take precedence over the loan. The New York State Lien Law outlines the full scope of these obligations and the consequences of non-compliance in detail.
For Developers and Borrowers
Understanding the trust fund provisions helps borrowers structure disbursements correctly, avoiding personal liability that can arise even after the underlying loan itself is fully repaid.
For General Contractors and Subcontractors
Contractors benefit from understanding that the filed building loan agreement discloses the financing available for the project, giving them a tool to assess their own payment risk before extending credit on a job.
For Investors Acquiring Financed Projects
Buyers and investors should confirm the building loan agreement filing during due diligence. This review helps identify potential lien priority issues before acquiring the project.
For Multiple Lenders Participating in a Single Project
When more than one private lender is involved in financing a construction project, coordinated and properly filed documentation becomes even more important, since gaps in filing can create priority disputes among the lenders themselves, not just with outside contractors. The American Bar Association’s guidance on construction lending provides additional context on how lien priority disputes play out when filing requirements are not followed.
Each of these applications depends on the same underlying principle. The protection the building loan agreement filing requirement is designed to provide only exists if it is satisfied correctly and on time.
Frequently Asked Questions About Lien Law Section 22
Is filing a building loan agreement the same as recording a mortgage?
Recording a mortgage establishes the lender’s general lien against the property. Section 22 addresses a separate priority issue. It determines the lender’s position against mechanics’ liens filed by contractors and suppliers.
What happens if a building loan agreement is filed late?
If lenders advance loan proceeds before completing the required filing, they may lose priority. Mechanics’ liens filed by contractors or suppliers can take precedence over those advances. This can happen even when the loan and mortgage were properly documented.
Can a lender file a summary statement instead of the full agreement?
Section 22 allows parties to file a statement instead of the full agreement. The statement must accurately disclose all required information. This includes the loan amount and the net sum available for improvements.
What personal liability can arise from the trust fund provisions?
Under Article 3-A, borrowers and in certain cases their principals can be held personally liable for diverting construction loan funds away from the project’s labor and material costs. This exposure exists independent of any mortgage default and can survive repayment of the loan itself.
Choosing the Right Legal Partner
Lien Law Section 22 compliance requires specific, technical experience that many attorneys handling general real estate or lending matters simply do not have. Look for:
- Direct experience filing building loan agreements and statements under Section 22, not just general familiarity with New York’s Lien Law
- A process for tracking modifications, ensuring that any change to the loan amount or disbursement terms is filed to preserve priority
- Understanding of Article 3-A trust fund provisions, protecting both lenders and borrowers from unexpected personal liability
- Look for attorneys with specific experience representing private lenders. Construction financing outside traditional banks often requires customized documentation. It also demands careful attention to filing requirements.
- Coordination with title companies and county clerks, ensuring that filings are accepted and properly indexed against the property
At Andelsman Law, our attorneys bring decades of experience with New York building loan agreements. We draft, file, and monitor agreements for private lenders, developers, and investors. Our team understands Lien Law Section 22 and its related trust fund requirements. We structure construction financing carefully to protect priority when clients need it most.
Satisfy the Building Loan Agreement Filing Requirement Before the First Advance
A building loan agreement is only as strong as the filing that stands behind it. Lien Law Section 22 determines whether a lender maintains priority over mechanics’ liens. Contractors and suppliers may file these liens against the project. Related trust fund rules also create personal liability risks. Those risks can extend far beyond the loan documents.
If you are structuring a construction loan, financing a development project through private lending, or acquiring a property with existing construction financing in place, contact Andelsman Law today to make sure your building loan agreement is filed correctly and your priority is fully protected.
📍 Based in Great Neck, NY, serving clients across NYC, Long Island, Westchester, and statewide | 📞 (516) 625-9200 | 🌐 andelsmanlaw.com
